From: owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca (Cdn-Firearms Digest) To: cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Subject: Cdn-Firearms Digest V15 #280 Reply-To: cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Sender: owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Errors-To: owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Precedence: normal owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Cdn-Firearms Digest Tuesday, September 25 2012 Volume 15 : Number 280 In this issue: [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: From: Subject: [none] Excerpt: Insider Report from Newsmax.com Sunday, September 23, 2012 6:42 AM We Heard... THAT nearly 20 years after O.J. Simpson was acquitted of killing his ex-wife Nicole and Ronald Goldman, trial witness Kato Kaelin has finally spoken out about Simpson's guilt or innocence. He told New York Post columnist Cindy Adams: "The statute of limitations has now passed . . . so I can now say . . . yes, he did it." He provided no details. As for why he didn't come forward sooner, he said: "I was too scared. I was terrified." Kaelin was staying at a guest house on the Simpson property and was present on the night of the 1994 murders. He testified at Simpson's criminal trial but was labeled by the prosecution as a hostile witness. Simpson was acquitted of the murders in 1995, but later found liable for the deaths in a civil suit filed by the victims' families. The former football hero is currently locked up in a Nevada prison for armed robbery and other crimes. Newsmax.com 1501 Northpoint Parkway, Suite 104 West Palm Beach, FL 33407 USA ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] ...not blame Obama's top lawyer Re: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/report+attacks+botched+Mexico+operation+does+blame+Obamas+lawyer/7275849/story.html They're missing the point, and the point is: It doesn't matter what party is in the majority these days, it is the bureaucracy that is out of control. The only effective treatment for the malignancy it has become is marked reduction in government programming and taxation, a total end to deficit spending, and a marked reduction in regulatory power and the total burden of regulation. The Americans have to realize that it wasn't regulation and taxation that got them to the top of the socioeconomic dungheap, it was Freedom. Plain, simple Freedom - the ONLY wealth generator the world has ever known. I seriously doubt this will be done in a controlled, intelligent fashion for the simple reason that it would require the cooperation of the bureaucratic monster to limit its own powers. Therefore, there are "interesting" times ahead. -- M.J. Ackermann, MD (Mike) Rural Family Physician, Box 13, 120 Cameron Rd. Sherbrooke, NS Canada B0J 3C0 902-522-2172 mikeack@ns.sympatico.ca "Hope for the best, but be prepared for the worst". ** Please always use BCC and erase appended address lists when forwarding or sending to groups ** ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Date 20120923 From: mikeack@ns.sympatico.ca Subject: List subject and contributor headings I note of late that the Date, From, and Subject headings are not working. [Mod note: I had to upgrade to a new server with new (different) operating system and software. This is one of the last bugs that I have to fix, but I had to go back to the oil patch where I am unable to work on it. Should have it fixed by Friday. BUZ] Until such time as these functions are restored, may I suggest we all add this information to the top of our email contributions before sending them to the CFD? This will make the Digest more understandable to us all. Best regards, -- M.J. Ackermann, MD (Mike) Rural Family Physician, Sherbrooke, NS mikeack@ns.sympatico.ca "Hope for the best, but be prepared for the worst". ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Subject: Sarnia Police Make City's Largest Gun Seizure Allow me to play devil's advocate: The non-firearms owning public may now ask; How did Mr. Giberson slip through the net? Could someone like him, but more disturbed, be in possession of such seemingly dangerous weapons clearly not needed for hunting or sport? What about theft? Mr. Giberson has been charged with improper storage. Could his carelessness have put his community at serious risk? These are the questions that the left wing media will demand and fully exploit. And therein lies the difficulties faced by firearm owners in their on going battle for acceptance by the public at large. As qualified firearm owners, especially those of us who possess restricted licences in the 12(6)(5) category, we must remain vigilant to exercise due diligence and proper decorum in life so as not to bring the entire firearms community into disrepute. We have a collective responsibility to conduct our private and public lives beyond reproach. Unfortunately, high profile individuals such as Mr. Giberson sabotage our best efforts to our collective detriment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Let's substitute this with another socially and politically oppressed group, the Jews of Nazi Germany. What if Mr. Giberson were a jew in Nazi Germany? The non-jewish public may now ask, how did a Mr. Giberson slip through the net? Could someone like him, but more disturbed, be living amonst us? What if he is also a thief? Mr.Giberson has been charged with improper storage of his property. Could his carelessness have put his community at serious risk? These are the questions that the left wing media will demand and fully exploit. [Nazis (national socialists) are lefties so this fits nicely.] And therein lies the difficulties faced by the Jews in their on going battle for acceptance by the public at large. As qualified jews, especially those of us who possess restricted golden stars in the 12(6)(5) category, we must remain vigilant to exercise due diligence and proper decorum in life so as not to bring the entire jewish community into disrepute. Unfortunately, high profile jews such as Mr. Giberson sabotage our best efforts to our collective detriment. Apease, apease, apease the Con dictator. Wear your golden stars (licenses) properly, and all will be well. Yours in Tyranny, Joe Gingrich White Fox ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] > As qualified firearm owners, especially those of us who possess > restricted > licences in the 12(6)(5) category, we must remain vigilant to > exercise due > diligence and proper decorum in life so as not to bring the entire > firearms community into disrepute. We have a collective > responsibility to > conduct our private and public lives beyond reproach. What we have, as individuals, is to be responsible members of society, which generally speaking, we are and have been. Hence the stats about how those who have P.A.L.s are much more likely to be less likely to be involved in criminal violence that are members of the general public. That has always been true, it would have been of the F.A.C. holders and even has been true for the group of those who purchase hunting licenses, too. But, alas, such facts, are only admissible in defense of a Right, not a privilege in law, and only so in politics should there be a high audience media ready, willing and able to do so. But above reproach, everyone? that's an impossible criteria, always has been, This is why it is used as "ammunition" to drive the entire civilian disarmament process. Sooner or later someone, who has gone through all the increasingly restrictive hoops and infringements of privacy and the state's reverse onus, will do something wrong. As the number of firearms owners shrinks so does the political cost of persecuting the ever few numbers of them, no matter how morally innocent, as a group, it's members are. For example, no one in gov't. is calling for the police to be disarmed, or even run like the U.K., where the average Bobby in the street is unarmed. Yet, we see from time to time criminal violence committed by police officers, sometimes using their service pistols. We see criminal incidents used to only argue for disarmament of civilians, but never to disarm the police. For those who "worship" state power, such an idea would never occur. In summation, it is a totalitarian, police state form of argument. It only applies to those who can't be, by it's political principle be trusted, the citizen. Whereas, the liberal democratic argument is that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Thus any abuse of power by agents of the state is evidence for it to be a responsibility for citizens to be armed, both as a individual right but also in order to defend democracy from tyranny. Once it became accepted, that the original idea of gun control being able to prevent criminals from obtaining guns became a bad joke, as "gun crime" has soared, a new excuse was needed. > Unfortunately, high profile individuals such as Mr. Giberson > sabotage our best efforts to our collective detriment. ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] CBC - Washington state wolf pack targeted for elimination Wolves roaming B.C. and Washington border area turn to livestock as food source CBC News Last Updated: Sep 24, 2012 12:55 PM ET Read 65 comments65 http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/09/24/wolves-washington-ranchers-eradication.html A wolf pack that ranges south from the Canadian border into northeast Washington state has been targeted for elimination by the state's Department of Fish and Wildlife, despite protected status for the animals. Ranchers in the area say the notorious Wedge pack of wolves, which move back and forth across the border between B.C. and Washington, have turned to livestock as their primary food source. "These wolves in this Wedge pack act different," says rancher Len McIrvin. "They are not eating any game, they are living strictly on cattle." The Wedge pack consists of at least eight grey wolves, whose range includes a remote, wedge-shaped area of northern Stevens County bordered by Canada and the Columbia and Kettle rivers. Wolves were eradicated in Washington by homesteaders almost a century ago, but their protected status has led to a recovery as the wolves moved in from Idaho, Montana and Canada. Fish and wildlife director Phil Anderson said the Wedge pack is believed to have killed or injured at least 15 cattle from the Diamond M herd, which grazes near the Canadian border. "Once wolves become habituated to livestock as their primary food source, all of the wolf experts we've talked to agree that we have no alternative but to remove the entire pack," Anderson said. "By doing that, we will preserve the opportunity for the recovery of grey wolves in balance with viable livestock operations." Natural prey such as white-tailed deer are abundant in the area, wildlife officials said. Anderson said marksmen would hunt the wolves from the ground, but helicopters might be used if necessary. Various non-lethal methods to control the predation were attempted by the rancher and wildlife officials, the department said, without success. The alpha male of the Wedge pack is equipped with a GPS and radio collar, which allows its movements to be tracked, and the cattle depredations matched the movements of the wolf and the accompanying pack. The department said the eastern Washington area has six confirmed packs - including the Wedge pack - and three other suspected packs, and that the elimination of one pack will not prevent a wider recovery of the wolves. ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/Backbenchers+Powerful+pawns/7288437/story.html Backbenchers: Powerful or pawns? By Natalie Stechyson, Postmedia News September 24, 2012 In the past, they've pushed to abolish capital punishment in Canada, they've won for wives the right to secure a divorce from their husbands and, more recently, they've reopened aspects of the abortion debate. So, are Parliament's backbench politicians really just the malleable, milquetoast political pawns they're often described as? If you had read a recent interview with Joan Crockatt, who will run as the federal Conservative candidate in Calgary Centre in the coming months, you might think so. She told the Globe and Mail: "If I'm a backbench MP, I'm just fine doing that. To me, the job is to support the prime minister in whatever way that he thinks." But if you followed the recent political agenda of Tory MP Stephen Woodworth, you might think differently. Woodworth's private member's motion on when human life begins has garnered plenty of headlines and controversy - and a second round of debate Friday. Although it doesn't have the support of the prime minister, it will be voted on this week. "I know that the prime minister's position has likely depressed the support that I might have received from some people," Woodworth, the MP for Kitchener Centre, said during an impassioned speech on motion 312 last week. That hasn't stopped him from charging ahead on an issue dear to his heart. Backbenchers have indirect, not direct power, which they must wield creatively and wisely, says Saskatoon-Humboldt MP Brad Trost. Still, the limits can be hard to swallow, he says, such as when there isn't enough funding for a particular infrastructure project in an MP's riding. "When it doesn't come through, you feel that maybe you failed a little bit and you didn't deliver," Trost says. The biggest hurdle is how to make your voice heard, says the Tory MP. That's why Trost, a backbencher since he was elected in 2004, says he hopes to introduce a private member's bill later this year that would give backbenchers more power. He's vague, however, about what form that bill might take. It could focus on better communication and more direct input from backbenchers, or less control of the political agenda from other government institutions. It could also include ways of making MPs more accountable to their own constituents. Backbenchers have proven, historically, that they do have heft when they want to wield it. One of Canada's more notable private member's bills was independent MP Joseph Shaw's 1925 "An Act Respecting Divorce," which gave "the wife a right to secure a divorce from her husband upon the same grounds upon which a husband may secure a divorce from his wife." And although capital punishment wasn't formally abolished in Canada until 1976, it was backbencher Robert Bickerdike who first introduced a seminal private member's bill to wipe it from the Criminal Code in 1914, according to David Chandler's Capital Punishment in Canada. Of the 242 private member's bills proposed in the 41st session of Parliament, four received Royal Assent - three were from Conservative MPs and one from a Liberal MP. Liberal MP Geoff Regan's bill designated March 26 as Purple Day to increase public awareness about epilepsy. Tory John Carmichael's bill will make it illegal to prevent someone from displaying the flag, as long as it is displayed in a "manner befitting this national symbol." Tory Joy Smith's bill aimed at combating international human trafficking. And Dan Albas's bill will make it possible to transport wine intended for personal use between provinces. A backbench MP, or backbencher, is a member of Parliament who is not a cabinet minister, minister of state or parliamentary secretary. The term is usually, though not always, taken to mean someone from the governing party. Despite a frequently low profile, these MPs have a range of responsibilities, from representing their constituencies to scrutinizing government spending. They sit on committees studying bills. They can ask questions during question period. A backbencher can also move adoption of a private member's motion or a private member's bill: legislation sponsored by an individual MP that is not part of the government's proposed legislative package. The process of getting his bill passed showed Albas, a self-proclaimed "rookie," that a backbencher can bring local concerns to Parliament's attention and get action, the MP for Okanagan-Coquihalla says. "Ministers are very much focused on good policy over the macro. But I think as members, it's our jobs to be able to bring up and make representations on how those policies are working." Conservative MP Brian Storseth says being a backbencher allowed him to move his particular interests forward, in his case a bill to drop some hate speech sections from the Human Rights Act. That bill made it through first reading in the Senate this summer. "(Being a backbencher) allows you to take your own issues that are important to your constituents and make them your priority. And I think that cabinet ministers sometimes don't have that ability," Storseth, the MP for Westlock-St. Paul says. Nelson Wiseman, an associate professor at the University of Toronto specializing in Canadian politics, argues that backbenchers have relatively little influence, whether in opposition or in government, because of a slow centralization of power in the prime minister's office that has been in motion since the Trudeau era. "For the governing party, and for the opposition parties, the perceived benefit is that they're united. They're singing from the same songbook," Wiseman says. "From the point of view of the public, it's sad because you're just subjected to spin rather than what people think or their authentic or genuine words." Private member's bills are a bone thrown to backbenchers, Wiseman says. Ned Franks, a professor emeritus at Queen's University and the founding president of the Canadian Study of Parliament Group, goes further, arguing backbencher's private bills are sometimes used to front government policy. "But that doesn't mean all private member's business by Conservatives is going to be party business - it just means some of it is going to be," he adds. While Storseth says he can't respond on behalf of all private member's bills, his own bill wasn't a case of simply pushing Tory policy. ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Metis Nation of Ontario Metis want expanded hunting rights By Monte Sonnenberg, Simcoe Reformer - Sunday, September 23, 2012 6:29:42 EDT PM http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/2012/09/23/metis-want-expanded-hunting-rights PORT DOVER - The Metis Nation of Ontario has a bone to pick with the Ontario government when it comes to hunting, fishing and trapping rights. Because of their connection to the broader aboriginal community, Metis would like to enjoy the same rights when it comes to "harvesting" wildlife. They base this claim, in part, on the centrality of hunting, fishing and trapping to Metis culture and tradition. Arguably, were it not for this connection to wildlife, the Metis in Canada as we know them would never have arisen. "We're saying every Metis has the right to harvest," says Derrick Pont of Beamsville, vice president and chair of the Niagara Region Metis Council. "We're asking why they're putting a cap on it." As it stands, the Ministry of Natural Resources issues a maximum of 1,200 harvester permits to the Metis community each year. With 73,000 registered Metis province-wide, lifting the cap as requested would significantly change the complexion of hunting, fishing and trapping in Ontario. Metis also feel enforcement in this area leaves something to be desired. The MNR issues the harvester permits through the Metis Nation of Ontario. They are then re-issued as an MNO document. Some conservation officers make light of the document when it is presented. "The inspectors laugh when we show them our Metis council harvester card," says Marilyn Hew, secretary-treasurer of the Toronto and York Region Metis Council. "They laugh and say show us the real one." This discussion of Metis issues was held Saturday at the first annual Metis Rendezvous at Silver Lake Park in Port Dover. The weather was questionable at the outset and there were fears of a rain-out. However, the skies cleared late in the morning. Those who attended were rewarded with a crisp, lovely fall afternoon and a feast at 6 p.m. to end the day. "It was wonderful and the crowds were good," said Jerry Clarke of Waterford, owner of the Metis Bee Honey House & Gift Shop in Port Dover and an organizer of Saturday's event. "The vendors are very happy. Representatives from assorted Metis councils are here, and they're interested in helping make next year's event even better." Those attending enjoyed live traditional folk music and demonstrations of Metis culture. Re-enactors staged a traditional Metis trappers' camp while children heard traditional tales such as the legend behind the dream catcher. Ian Angus of Waterford attended in full Metis regalia to demonstrate traditional smudging ceremonies. These involve the burning of sweet grass and other herbs and the inhalation and immersion in the resulting fumes. "It's a cleansing ceremony," Angus said. "It's an alignment thing. It helps you get rid of the negative thoughts and brings you back to centre, though not in a weird, Scientology sort of way. It's about leaving the negative behind and asking the Creator for help." Angus claims an aboriginal and Scots background. He draws strength from the celebration of both. "It's the best feeling in the world," he said. "I throw on a kilt, go to the Highland Games and feel the same way." Metis in Canada arose when European trappers in the 17th century made families with aboriginal women. Court decisions have defined Metis as people of mixed aboriginal background who are recognized within the broader Metis community and have a historical connection to Metis communities of the past. "You are not Metis just because your grand-mama was Cree," says MNO representative James Wagar of Toronto. Monte Sonnenberg 519-426-3528 ext. 150 monte.sonnenberg@sunmedia.ca ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] http://www2.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/forum/story.html?id¬9169c5-5f28-43f1-a4b9-73042f169782 Public Safety First Jonathan Sinclair, The StarPhoenix Published: Saturday, September 22, 2012 Much has been made of late about overcrowding in jails since the killing of an antagonistic and violent inmate on remand. The consensus from the left seems to be that too many criminals are going to jail and for too long. Others seem to think that they all get what they deserve while in the joint. What we need to start this debate with is the first and most important principle of the "justice" system, which is to protect the general population. Much has been made about mandatory minimum sentences being an example of "failed American" policies. Let's first remember that minimum sentences apply to violent and weapons offences. Someone needs to explain how public safety is enhanced by violent (often repeat) offenders going through the revolving door that has characterized the failed Canadian "hug a thug" experiment for the last 40 years. We do need new jails in this province and across Canada. In the meantime, I would rather have jails be the place with the increased danger than my community. And if those behind bars don't like the conditions until then, they can try being law abiding citizens. Jonathan Sinclair Saskatoon ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/Respect+rights/7293876/story.html Respect Rights By Geoff Galloway, The StarPhoenix September 25, 2012 Re: Public safety first (SP, Sept. 22). It was a shock to see such a lack of regard for the rights of the accused. Unlike the alleged killer, the victim was not in jail because he had been convicted of a crime. He was just another member of the public whose safety should have come first. By definition, a prisoner on remand is innocent until proven guilty. This principle is entrenched in the law of all civilized countries. It is listed in Sec. 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Shakespeare's day, to be ignorant of it was the mark of a buffoon. Some years ago, in the wake an armed robbery, a British cabinet minister stood up in Parliament and said "The people who committed the robbery have been captured." The House dissolved in uproar, after which he sheepishly corrected himself by referring to the "people who allegedly committed the robbery." In this case, it would be nice to see a bit more outrage. The protection of the law is for everybody, not just for model citizens. Geoff Galloway Saskatoon ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] ...virtual war zone" Most of our discussion here centers around Main Stream Media (MSM) news articles and discussion, but these days newsworthy issues sometimes only show up in the blogosphere. Sometimes the MSM picks up the story, sometimes the blogosphere is it's only popular outlet. ========================= http://blackrod.blogspot.ca/2012/08/veteran-police-officer-declares.html Sunday, August 19, 2012 Veteran police officer declares downtown Winnipeg is a virtual war zone Even as month-old information is passed off as "news" by the Winnipeg Free Press, the biggest crime story in Winnipeg languishes untouched by the city's "professional" journalists. Crime reporters have been trying to put the latest outbreak of shootings and home invasions into context. CTV on Friday blamed it on a clash between two street gangs---MOB and Indian Posse. Trying to advance the story in Saturday's paper, FP reporter Mike McIntyre breathlessly wrote that "police and justice sources tell the Free Press the M.O.B. is no longer a united front and has broken into two factions..." http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/mob-breakup-is-bad-news---edited-166628926.html Uh, yeah. That's what the Winnipeg Sun reported ONE MONTH AGO after the details were revealed in open court. http://www.winnipegsun.com/2012/07/17/street-gang-splinters-into-two "A mysterious rift among members of a notorious Winnipeg street gang has led to the birth of a new splinter group inside provincial jails and on city streets, the Winnipeg Sun has learned. A handful of MOB (Most Organized Brothers) members have split off and recently formed a new gang faction dubbed the “334” — a numerical nod to the tattoos worn by some MOB members, a Manitoba Justice gang prosecutor told court Tuesday." But the unity or otherwise of a pathetic assemblage of thuggish losers pales beside the bombshells dropped by James Jewell, one of Winnipeg's most experienced police officers, on his blog http://jgjewell.shawwebspace.ca/blog/post/time_to_cut_the_bullshit Jewell quit the force last year after 25 years of service. And, after senior officers railroaded him out of the homicide division for standing up against outgoing Police Chief Keith McCaskill's dumbest policy ever -- rotating officers through Homicide every three years, diluting the institutional memory and maximizing the number of cold cases. Free to speak his mind at last, Jewell revealed the state of the city as the police know it. And he threw down the gauntlet to the outgoing Chief of Police, the Mayor, and even the provincial government. He wrote: * downtown Winnipeg is a virtual war zone "crawling with rival gangsters all armed with dangerous and offensive weapons"--- guns, knives, and pepper spray * routine police patrols are a thing of the past and 'taking back the streets' is a romantic idea but simply not possible with current resources. * Winnipeg is not a safe City "despite the rhetoric that is spewed from our Political leaders and Chief of Police." "I was shocked when I read a quote from Mayor Katz in which he is reported to have stated; "I have no problem going downtown, I have no problem going to the North End, regardless of the day of the week, regardless of what time it is.” "This kind of denial is reckless and dangerous." * "Feeble sentences, grossly applied early parole and release philosophies, countless breaches of recognizance and other orders ... The scales of justice so horribly out of balance." "The status quo fed to the public and media again, more explanations, minimizations and justifications.....don’t be fooled, its all B.S." "Our status as the most violent City in the Country is simply shameful & unacceptable." "Real leaders would not deny these problems, they would see them as opportunities." "Real Leaders wanted!!! " Read the whole thing and shudder. And remember these are the observations of somebody who has worked for 25 years to protect you and your family, who is not running for election, and who is not paid to be a Pollyanna. *********************** Oh, the irony. The unadulterated irony. Monday night, Winnipeg Free Press reporters Mary Agnes Welch and Dan Lett are giving potential citizen journalists a "crash course" in using Freedom of Information requests to dig up stories. It's something organized by the Community News Commons, the much-hyped project to train citizen journalists in "proper" news gathering. To be a fly on the wall... You'll remember that it was an FOI request that uncovered the secret role of former FP editor Margo Goodhand, Welch's and Lett's boss, in killing The Great Canadian Talk Show, a popular and influential radio talk show that regularly shamed the Free Press by pointing out it's bad news reporting, biased news reporting, slanted political reporting, and overall reporter incompetence. http://blackrod.blogspot.ca/2012/07/margo-goodhands-legacy-in-winnipeg.html The FOI turned up an email recounting how Goodhand used the despicable tactic of libel chill to encourage her friend Stephanie Forsyth, the president of Red River College, to "do something" about TGCTS which was broadcast on the RRC-affiliated radio station KICK-FM. But after the show was cancelled abruptly, angry listeners turned into citizen journalists who, without any help from Free Press reporters, uncovered the fact that the radio station was being run illegally by a secret committee that reported directly to Stephanie Forsyth. They took that information to the CRTC which began asking questions of it's own. After KICK-FM confessed that they had no records or minutes of the secret "executive committee" that made the decision to kill TGCTS, not even of the Board meeting where it was allegedly constituted/ empowered, Red River decided it didn't want to run a silly old radio station anyway, and gave up the radio licence. So Margo Goodhand's interference resulted in the death of the popular radio station that had served Winnipeg music fans, and students of Red River's journalism course, for 10 years. We can't imagine how News Commons coordinator Noah Erenberg, who arranged the Monday seminar, will address the role of citizen journalists in uncovering the damage Winnipeg Free Press editor Margo Goodhand did to journalism in Winnipeg. -30- ------------------------------ End of Cdn-Firearms Digest V15 #280 *********************************** Submissions: mailto:cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Mailing List Commands: mailto:majordomo@scorpion.bogend.ca Moderator's email: mailto:owner-cdn-firearms@scorpion.bogend.ca List owner: mailto:owner-cdn-firearms@scorpion.bogend.ca FAQ list: http://www.canfirearms/Skeeter/Faq/cfd-faq1.html Web Site: http://www.canfirearms.ca CFDigest Archives: http://www.canfirearms.ca/archives To unsubscribe from _all_ the lists, put the next four lines in a message and mailto:majordomo@scorpion.bogend.ca unsubscribe cdn-firearms-digest unsubscribe cdn-firearms-chat unsubscribe cdn-firearms end (To subscribe, use "subscribe" instead of "unsubscribe".)