From: owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca (Cdn-Firearms Digest) To: cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Subject: Cdn-Firearms Digest V15 #509 Reply-To: cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Sender: owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Errors-To: owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Precedence: normal owner-cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Cdn-Firearms Digest Thursday, January 24 2013 Volume 15 : Number 509 In this issue: [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] [none] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: From: Subject: [none] Date: Thu, January 24, 2013 8:33 am From: "Dennis R. Young" Subject: HILL TIMES: 51% want stronger gun control, says new poll Canadians evenly split on feds scrapping long-gun registry, but 51% also want stronger gun control, says new poll A new public opinion survey has uncovered evenly-divided opinion about the government’s dismantling of the federal long-gun registry, nearly a year after Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservatives used their majority to pass legislation in Parliament to end the gun-tracking system. By TIM NAUMETZ | Published: Wednesday, 01/23/2013 4:25 pm EST Last Updated: Wednesday, 01/23/2013 6:52 pm EST http://www.hilltimes.com/news/politics/2013/01/23/canadians-evenly-split-on-feds-scrapping-long-gun-registry-but-51%25-want/33433 A new public opinion survey has uncovered evenly-divided opinion about the government’s dismantling of the federal long-gun registry, nearly a year after Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservatives used their majority to pass legislation in Parliament to end the gun-tracking system. A Forum Research survey last week found 41 per cent of Canadians approving the controversial measure to dismantle the registry of rifles and shotguns and 41 per cent saying they disapproved of it. At the same time, the Forum Research poll found a slim 51-per-cent majority of Canadians, fuelled by an overwhelming majority in Quebec, want stricter gun controls in Canada. Disapproval of dismantling the registry was highest in Quebec at 65 per cent, with approval for ending the federal gun-tracking system highest in the three Prairie provinces at just over 60 per cent and in British Columbia at 51 per cent—the only three provinces where a majority approved the measure. Only 33 per cent of women approved of the decision to kill the rifle and shotgun registry, with 43 per cent disapproving and 23 per cent saying they did not know whether they approved or disapproved. Fully 50 per cent of men approved, while 39 per cent disapproved and 12 per cent did not know what position to take. Disapproval of the decision to end the registry was highest among those earning more than $60,000 a year—up to 47 per cent disapproval among those earning more than $100,000 a year. The mixed signals—majority support for tighter gun control and only 41 per cent disapproval of ending the registry—are perplexing, said Forum Research president Lorne Bozinoff. “While there is a consensus for existing or stricter gun control measures, Canadians appear to be happy to lose the one basic gun control measure they had, the long-gun registry,” Mr. Bozinoff told The Hill Times. But the president of the Coalition for Gun Control, Wendy Cukier, blames the confusing signals on the lead taken by Canadian politicians, who even after the Sandy Hook School shooting death of 20 elementary school children in Newtown, Conn., last month did not raise a hue and cry about the Conservative decision to end the long-gun registry and destroy its records. Only a week before the shootings, Liberal leadership hopeful Justin Trudeau (Papineau, Que.) described the Canadian gun registry as a failure, even though it had been established by a Liberal government under former prime minister Jean Chrétien. At the time, Mr. Trudeau was in Hawkesbury, Ont., one of many rural areas where voters had shifted to the Conservative Party from the Liberals over the past three elections as Prime Minister Harper (Calgary Southwest, Alta.) and his Conservatives successfully used division over the registry against the Liberal party and the NDP. Although Mr. Trudeau’s highly-publicized position was disputed by several women running for the Liberal leadership, Liberal MP Marc Garneau (Westmount-Ville Marie, Que.), who later entered the race, and interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae (Toronto Centre, Ont.) declined to comment, saying there was no point because the Conservatives had already killed the registry. Ms. Cukier pointed out Australia’s former prime minister John Howard, a close friend of Mr. Harper’s, recently used The New York Timesto defend the tougher gun control and registry laws that his government established in Australia. Mr. Howard was commenting in reaction to pressure for tighter U.S. gun control following the Sandy Hook killings. “The Canadian experience parallels that of Australia, with the number of gun deaths reduced by over 35 per cent since the introduction of the registry and yet it is labelled a failure,” Ms. Cukier said in an email to The Hill Times. “I am sure that the political rhetoric in Canada has obscured the clear evidence that the registry worked and has something to do with the polling results,” Ms. Cukier said. During Commons committee hearings into Bill C-19, the legislation the governing Conservatives passed through Parliament to end the registry, the government packed committee hearings with witnesses, including members of Public Safety Minister Vic Toews’ (Provencher, Man.) publicly-appointed Firearms Advisory Committee, to argue other factors, including the aging of a generation of baby boomers, were behind the decline in long-gun homicides and injury. Mr. Howard recently wrote an opinion article, published in The New York Times, to describe how he and his Australian Liberal Party, governing in a coalition with the Conservative Australian National party, overcame rural conservative opposition to bring in stringent gun control following a notorious massacre where a gunman with a semi-automatic rifle killed 35 people in the Australian state of Tasmania. Mr. Howard wrote the article in support of U.S. President Barack Obama’s attempt to stiffen gun control following the Sandy Hook shootings. PAGE TWO: http://www.hilltimes.com/news/politics/2013/01/23/canadians-evenly-split-on-feds-scrapping-long-gun-registry-but-51%25-want/33433?page_requested=2 ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:25:01 -0600 From: Alfred Hovdestad Subject: Re: Questions and answers On 23/01/13 06:37 AM, JULES SOBRIAN wrote: > > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:37:38 -0500 > From: JULES SOBRIAN > Subject: Questions and answers > > >> We ALL KNOW they are going to ask, "Why do you NEED a semi-automatic?" >> or "Why do you NEED a handgun?" And way too often we come across with >> a response which makes us look either uneducated or defensive. This >> isn't going to win us any support. > Q: Why do you need a semi-automatic? > > A: Because I might miss with the first shot. > Another approach is to take the offensive. Turn the question around and make them defend their position. Q: Why do you need a semi-automatic? A: How will banning semi-automatics make anyone any safer? Can you guarantee that banning semi-automatics will lower the crime rate? -- Alfred ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:38:32 -0600 From: "Joe Gingrich" Subject: It's on! Feinstein unveiling gun-grab plan JPFO Webmaster JPFO Article: It's on! Feinstein unveiling gun-grab plan Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:35 AM "The Washington campaign to control guns moves into high gear tomorrow when Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the author of the nation's original "assault" gun ban in the 1990s, announces her new proposal to fingerprint, photograph and investigate Americans who already have weapons." ..... Thus begins this article from WND -- looking in depth into the predicted collection of Senator Feinstein's new "gun control" plans. It also contains some very "interesting" archive video clips which tend to show the way things have changed. Read the entire article http://jpfo.org/articles-assd03/feinstein-gun-grab.htm. Refer to the "Sandy Hook Index" http://jpfo.org/articles-assd02/sandy-hook-index.htm for an archive collection of material we have shown since the tragic events at the Newtown Elementary School. Most is directly resulting from the event but also there are items simply clarifying various aspects of the "gun control" issue. Yours in Freedom, The Liberty Crew at JPFO Protecting you by creating solutions to destroy "gun control" Our mailing address is: jpfo@jpfo.org P.O. Box 270143,Hartford ,WI 53027, USA ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:07:09 -0600 From: "Joe Gingrich" Subject: It's on! Feinstein unveiling gun-grab plan http://jpfo.org/articles-assd03/feinstein-gun-grab.htm It's on! Feinstein unveiling gun-grab plan Legislation tracks lawful owners, bans 120 specific weapons "There are only two reasons for a federal list on gun owners: to either tax them or take them" (LePierre) On Capitol Hill, January 23, 2013 Article source: http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/its-on-feinstein-unveiling-gun-grab-plan/ The Washington campaign to control guns moves into high gear tomorrow when Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the author of the nation's original "assault" gun ban in the 1990s, announces her new proposal to fingerprint, photograph and investigate Americans who already have weapons. Her office told the Washington Times she will hold a press conference Thursday. Her original ban, which existed from 1994 until 2004, was not renewed by Congress after law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, testified it was ineffective in cutting crime. Nevertheless, the ban on "assault" weapons is being proposed again, only this time it's on steroids. Feinstein earlier announced her plan to ban the "sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of 120 specifically named firearms, certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or more military characteristics; and semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds." She claims her plan will strengthen the 1994 ban by outlawing weapons that have a particular characteristic, such as a "thumbhole stock." Feinstein also wants to outlaw ammunition magazines that take more than 10 rounds. She claims it would protect "rights of existing gun owners" because it would grandfather weapons already legally owned and exempt "disabled" weapons. But for any weapons that are "grandfathered," she would demand that the owners be investigated, photographed and fingerprinted; the type and serial number of the weapon be registered and local law enforcement certify that it is legal. The Washington Examiner points out that Feinstein's plan would cost every owner of a semiautomatic rifle another $200 in taxes for weapons they already have purchased and on which they already have paid taxes. The report said a $200 tax is imposed each time a National Firearms Act weapon is registered or transferred. "Presumably, each weapon registered as an NFA firearm would be subject to the same restrictions," the report said. It also points out that Feinstein's ban on any transfers would include "assault" weapons, which means owners of semiautomatic rifles would be allowed to pay the tax and keep them until they die, when they would be forfeited to the government. For support, Feinstein cites a letter to the editor on the American Journal of Public Health in which two people wrote that "when Maryland imposed a more stringent ban on assault pistols and high-capacity magazines in 1994, it led to a 55 percent drop in assault pistols recovered by the Baltimore Police Department." She also applauded Barack Obama's recent strategy for controlling guns. "He was exactly right when he said 'weapons designed for the theater of war have no place' in our society. I couldn't agree more," said Feinstein, who once had her own concealed carry permit because she perceived a threat to herself. The moves were prompted by the Newtown, Conn., school shooting in which a 20-year-old man killed his own mother, then took her guns and went to a nearby school and killed 20 students and five adults. Ironically, perhaps because of the coming ban, school officials have been buying weapons. It was reported this week that the Fontana Unified School District Police Department had purchased 14 AR-15 "assault" weapons to protect students. Supt. Carl. Olsen-Binks said the "assault" rifles are being stored in locked safes on campuses for officers to use if needed. Whether the extreme measures Feinstein is proposing will succeed remains to be seen. While the White House and Senate are led by Democrats, the U.S. House of Representatives has a Republican majority. And the National Rifle Association has blasted the concept. In a recent ad, the NRA pointed out Obama's own children go to a school with armed guards, and he recently signed legislation giving himself lifetime protection, but he wants to deprive the average American of the same rights. Wayne LaPierre, the NRA executive director, said, "We're told that to stop insane killers, we must accept less freedom, less than the criminal class and the political elites, less than they keep for themselves." He said, "We believe we deserve and have every right to the same freedom that our government leaders keep for themselves and the same capabilities and the same technologies that criminals use to prey upon us and our families." He warned that the federal government never is happy simply with knowing information about gun owners. "He wants to put every firearms transaction right under the thumb of the federal government and he wants to keep all of those names in a national federal gun database. There are only two reasons for a federal list on gun owners: to either tax them or take them," LePierre said. Feinstein's inconsistency on gun control was captured on video: (Also available on separate page) At a U.S. Senate hearing on terrorism after the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, she told "a little anecdote" of how she carried concealed to protect herself after two assassination attempts by the New World Liberation Front, the NWLF. She explained: "I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that's what I did. I was trained in firearms. I walked to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon and I made the determination if somebody was going to try and take me out, I was going to take them with me." Michael Hammond, legislative counsel for Gun Owners of America, asked in an interview with WND, "Do we need any more proof that she is a hypocrite?" Hammond said Feinstein "has no problem getting Congress to buy armed guards for Capitol Hill." "Does she consider herself more precious and more valuable than our children?" he asked. Feinstein reportedly no longer has her concealed carry permit. She championed her private firearm ownership the same year she called for banning "all" firearm ownership. In an interview with "60 Minutes" in 1995 she said, "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. Mr. and Mrs. America, turn "em all in, I would have done it." See her comments in the "60 Minutes" interview: Another video shows Vice President Joe Biden in a 2008 campaign speech in Virginia opposing gun control. "I guarantee ya, Barack Obama ain't taking my shotguns so don't buy that malarkey, [anti-gun Democrats] gonna start peddling that to you. I've got two if he tries to fool with my Baretta he's got a problem." See the Biden video: However, in 1989, as a senator, Biden introduced legislation for an assault weapons ban that was defeated but then revived by Feinstein. Ironically, Feinstein serves in Congress with Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., who spoke once at a fundraiser for Kathleen Soliah, aka Sara Jane Olson, who was part of the NWLF, the group accused of attempting to bomb Feinstein's home. Yours in Freedom, The Liberty Crew at JPFO Protecting you by creating solutions to destroy "gun control" P.O. Box 270143 | Hartford, WI 53027 Phone (262) 673-9745 | Fax (262) 673-9746 | jpfo@jpfo.org ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:53:03 -0600 From: "Joe Gingrich" Subject: Obamism Will Fail Because Socialism Always Does http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/23/obamaism_will_fail_because_socialism_always_does Excerpt: Obamism Will Fail Because Socialism Always Does "We're in the midst here of designed class and race wars." by Rush Limbaugh January 23, 2013 There's a lot of factors, by the way, that go into why Obama was reelected, and largely it's not enough Romney voters turned out. It's a whole 'nother discussion for a whole 'nother day. But we're in the midst here of, I think, designed -- I don't say this lightly. We're in the midst here of designed class and race wars. They're brewing out there. The president, in an inaugural address, the president of the United States was filled with venom for his political opponents, and there are 60 some odd million of them who voted against him. It's not just the Republicans in Washington. There's 67 million Americans who voted against Obama. He declared war against them, too. He declared war against Republicans and, by extension, anybody who voted for them. ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Date: Thu, January 24, 2013 1:29 pm From: "Dennis R. Young" Subject: School brings in high-powered assault weapons School brings in high-powered assault weapons By Gillian Flaccus, The Associated Press 4 hours ago http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/24/16677346-school-brings-in-high-powered-assault-weapons The semiautomatic rifles look like they belong in a war zone instead of a suburban public school, but officials in this Los Angeles-area city say the high-powered weapons now in the hands of school police could prevent a massacre. Fontana Unified School District police purchased 14 of the Colt LE6940 rifles last fall, and they were delivered the first week of December - a week before the Connecticut school shooting. Over the holiday break, the district's 14 school police officers received 40 hours of training on the rifles. Officers check them out for each shift from a fireproof safe in the police force's main office. Fontana isn't the first district to try this. Other Southern California districts also have rifle programs - some that have been in operation for several years. Fontana school police Chief Billy Green said he used money from fingerprinting fees to purchase the guns for $14,000 after identifying a "critical vulnerability" in his force's ability to protect students. The officers, who already wear sidearms, wouldn't be able to stop a shooter like the one in Connecticut, he said Wednesday. "They're not walking around telling kids, 'Hurry up and get to class' with a gun around their neck," the chief said. "Parents need to know that if there was a shooter on their child's campus that was equipped with body armor or a rifle, we would be limited in our ability to stop that threat to their children." Some parents and students, however, reacted with alarm to the news that school resource officers were being issued the rifles during their shifts. The officers split their time between 44 schools in the district and keep the rifles in a safe at their assigned school or secured in their patrol car each day before checking the weapon back in to the school police headquarters each night. Only sergeants trained for years to use the rifles are authorized to check out the rifles from the police armory, where they are kept. "If the wrong person gets ahold of the gun, then we have another shooter going around with a gun. What happens then?" said James Henriquez, a 16-year-old sophomore who just enrolled at Fontana High School this week after moving from Texas. Other students said they felt disillusioned that officials would spend money on semiautomatic rifles while the district eliminated its comprehensive guidance counseling program two years ago. "They should get guns, but not as many and not spend so much money on them," said student Elizabeth Tovar. "They should use the money to get back our counselors because a lot of us really need them." The district saved millions by restructuring guidance services, said Superintendent Cali Olsen-Binks. The 40,000-student district came up with the school rifle program after consulting with top school safety experts and looking at what other large districts had done, said Olsen-Binks. Santa Ana Unified School District, in nearby Orange County, has had a rifle program for about two years that operates similarly to the one Fontana has started, said police Cpl. Anthony Bertagna. The Los Angeles School Police Department also deploys rifles to its officers as needed, the department said in a statement. It would not say how many rifles district police have but said the weapons are kept in the department's armory and are handed out and returned daily. "I came from a teaching background, and it's appalling to think that we'd have to have security officers - let alone armed police officers - on our campuses," Olsen-Binks said. "But the bottom line is ... everybody has anxiety over school safety right now." ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:43:01 -0800 From: Todd Birch Subject: wait length for firearms transfer # My wife and I are caught up in a backlog awaiting transfer #s from the BC CPFO for newly purchased pistols. In the meantime, violence with guns continues. But who needs a gun for violence? The latest gang-related "targeted"ť incident involves the use of baseball bats and a SWORD! And the RCMP has "ASKED"ť Hells Angels to be nice and NOT to establish their new clubhouse in Surrey. Next they will be asking for them to forego any illegal activities ...... Only in Canada, you say ...., pity. ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] SunnewsTV is trying to persuade the CRTC to place them in a tier 1 access for cable/satellite subscribers which is where CBC/GLOBAL/CTV is now. It would give them a level playing field and access to a wider audience and enough advertising dollars to stay in business. To show public support for their bid is the following website to sign a message to the CRTC or I suppose you could mail a letter if you prefer. http://canadiantvfirst.ca/ SunnewsTV is the only TV news that isn't anti-gun, anti-hunting, anti- male, in Canada. It does highlight cases of abuse due to our current set of gun laws and regulatory morass. It even features well spoken lawyers like Solomon Friedman and Ed Burlew. Brian Lilley does great work on the issue though admitting to not being a gun owner. Personally, I enjoy Ezra Levant and Michael Coren, though sometimes disagreeing with them. Levant's a lawyer and not afraid to argue any case he thinks has merit, regardless of the P.C. critics. Likewise Coren, who is the only media commentator who will touch on the issue of the conflict of civilizations that the West faces from the Islamist aggression trying to drag everyone back to the 7th Century. They don't take themselves too seriously. They enjoy their work and have a sense of humour lacking in the mainstream(consensus) media ------------------------------ Date: From: Subject: [none] http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/obama-has-hijacked-the-american-revolution/ Obama has hijacked the American revolution Pat Buchanan: Speech about equality was 'nice prose - and transparent nonsense' "The only way to equalize rewards is to take from those who have earned and give to those who have not. And that requires the kind of redistributionst regime the Founding Fathers would have risen up against." Published: 4 hours ago "Second Term Begins With a Sweeping Agenda for Equality," ran the eight-column banner in which the Washington Post captured the essence of Obama's second inaugural. There he declared: "What binds this nation together . what makes us exceptional - what makes us American - is our allegiance to an idea, articulated in a declaration made more than two centuries ago." Obama then quoted our Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Our "union," Obama went on, was "founded on the principles of liberty and equality." Nice prose - and transparent nonsense. How could the American Union have been founded on the principle of equality, when "equality" is not mentioned in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights or the Federalist Papers? How could equality be a founding principle of a nation, six of whose 13 original states had legalized slavery, and five of whose first seven presidents owned slaves all their lives? What Obama preached in his inaugural was not historical truth but progressive propaganda, an Orwellian rewrite of American history. Undeniably, the post-Civil War 13th, 14th and 15th amendments established an equality of constitutional rights. And from the Brown decision of 1954 through the civil rights acts of the 1960s, there was established an equality of civil rights. Black Americans were assured equal access to schools, public accommodations, the voting booth and housing. And Congress and the people overwhelmingly supported those laws. But if the nation did not establish equality of constitutional rights until the 1860s and equality of civil rights until the 1960s, how can Obama claim that "equality" has been the feature that "makes us American" and "binds this nation together." How can he say that our commitment to equality is what makes us "exceptional" - when every Western country believes in equal rights for all of its citizens, and it was the French Revolution, not ours, that elevated "egalite" to a founding principle. And when he says equality "is the star that guides us still," exactly what kind of equality is Obama talking about? Answer: The equality of which Obama speaks is not an equality of rights but an equality of results, an idea that dates not to the Founding Fathers, who would have been appalled by the idea, but to the 1960s. This equality is not a founding principle of the republic. It is ideological contraband. For such equality can only be achieved at the price of freedom, our true founding principle. That idea that "all of us are created equal - is the star that guides us still," said Obama in his inaugural, "just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall." Astonishing. The president is here making the brazen claim that the roots of modern feminism and gay rights can be traced straight back to the Founding Fathers and founding principles of our republic. But how? The sanctum sanctorum of modern feminism is Roe v. Wade, the discovery of a constitutional right to an abortion. Yet, for every generation of Americans before 1973, abortion was a heinous crime. And can anyone seriously argue that a barroom brawl with cops by homosexual patrons of Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village in 1969 was but another battle in the long war for liberty begun at Lexington, Concord and Bunker Hill? How could that be, when the author of the declaration Obama cites, Thomas Jefferson, believed homosexuality should be treated as rape, and George Washington ordered homosexuals drummed out of his army? What Obama was attempting at the Capitol, with his repeated lifts from Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, was to portray his own and his party's egalitarianism as a continuation of the great cause that triumphed at Yorktown and Appomattox. He is hijacking the American Revolution, claiming an ancestral lineage for his ideology that is utterly fraudulent and bogus. Feminism, the gay-rights movement and the post-1965 civil-rights movement, with their demand for equality not simply of rights but of rewards, cannot be achieved without trampling on the freedoms for which the patriot fathers fought. And they cannot triumph without creating a permanent, mammoth and redistributionist state more powerful, intrusive and dictatorial than anything George III ever dreamed of. The freedom of all Americans to compete academically, athletically, artistically and economically must inevitably result in an inequality of incomes, wealth and rewards. Why? Because all men and women are by nature and nurture unequal. Some are talented, ambitious, industrious, lucky. And in a free society, such men and women will always reap a disproportionate share of fame and fortune. The only way to equalize rewards is to take from those who have earned and give to those who have not. And that requires the kind of redistributionist regime the Founding Fathers would have risen up against. As Obama's America rises, the old republic falls. ------------------------------ End of Cdn-Firearms Digest V15 #509 *********************************** Submissions: mailto:cdn-firearms-digest@scorpion.bogend.ca Mailing List Commands: mailto:majordomo@scorpion.bogend.ca Moderator email: mailto:owner-cdn-firearms@scorpion.bogend.ca List owner: mailto:owner-cdn-firearms@scorpion.bogend.ca FAQ list: http://www.canfirearms/Skeeter/Faq/cfd-faq1.html Web Site: http://www.canfirearms.ca CFDigest Archives: http://www.canfirearms.ca/archives To unsubscribe from _all_ the lists, put the next four lines in a message and mailto:majordomo@scorpion.bogend.ca unsubscribe cdn-firearms-digest unsubscribe cdn-firearms-chat unsubscribe cdn-firearms end (To subscribe, use "subscribe" instead of "unsubscribe".)